G.O.P. Open to Residency for Illegal Immigrants
Published: February 5, 2013 - New York Times
WASHINGTON — House Republicans on Tuesday staked out
what they cast as a middle-ground option in the debate over immigration,
pushing an approach that could include legal residency but not a path to
citizenship — as their Democratic counterparts favor — for the 11 million
illegal immigrants already in the country.
Republicans also signaled that they are open to the
idea of breaking immigration legislation into several smaller bills, which would
allow them to deal with the question of highly skilled workers, as well as a
farmworker program, without addressing what Democrats and immigration advocates
say is the larger issue of potential citizenship. Immigration advocates favor a
comprehensive measure to enable them to use elements that have bipartisan
backing to build support for broader legislation.
At a House Judiciary Committee hearing exploring an
overhaul of the immigration system — the first of several such hearings expected
in the House — Representative Robert W. Goodlatte, Republican of Virginia and
chairman of the committee, tried to frame what he called the question of the
day: gAre there options that we should consider between the extremes of mass
deportation and a pathway to citizenship for those not lawfully present in the
United States?h
It was a question later echoed by Representative Lamar
Smith, Republican of Texas and the former chairman of the committee, when
questioning Mayor Julián Castro of San Antonio. gDo you see any compromise area
between the current status quo and a path to citizenship for virtually all the
11 million who are illegal immigrants in the country today?h he asked.
Mr. Castro, whose twin brother, Representative Joaquín
Castro, is a newly elected Democrat from Texas, said he saw the compromise as ga
recognition that a path to citizenship will be earned citizenship,h meaning that
illegal immigrants would be forced to learn English, and pay fines and back
taxes before they could become citizens.
Representative Spencer Bachus, Republican of Alabama,
turned to the question of how to approach an overhaul of the system when he said
he thought the panelists could all agree that gitfs going to be a much easier
lift to solve the problem of highly skilled workers.h
gWhen you take comprehensive, then wefre dealing with
certain issues like full citizenship,h Mr. Bachus said. gAnd whatever else we
disagree on, I think we would agree on that thatfs a more toxic and contentious
issue, granting full amnesty.h
But Representative Cedric L. Richmond, Democrat of
Louisiana, countered that the only way to tackle immigration is through
comprehensive legislation. gWhy donft we just get the skilled labor part done
first?h Mr. Richmond asked. gWell, politically, and just being very practical
about it, if we got the skilled labor part done first, do you think we would
ever come behind it and finish the job? I think it has to be a comprehensive
approach or wefll never get to the hard part.h
Immigration advocates, who had been eagerly awaiting
the hearing for an early hint of the tenor of the debate on immigration as it
unfolds in the House, said the use of the word gamnestyh would most likely be a
bad sign for those in favor of a comprehensive overhaul.
Representative John Conyers Jr., Democrat of Michigan,
tried to set the tone early — gI hope no one uses the term eillegal immigrantsf
here today,h he said in his opening remarks. But the a-word, as immigration
advocates have called gamnesty,h came up twice. In addition to Mr. Bachus,
Representative Trey Gowdy, Republican of South Carolina, also used the phrase:
gThis is not our countryfs first foray into amnesty.h He expressed concern for
grespect for the rule of law.h
Meanwhile, Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, the
No. 2 House Republican, used a speech on his legislative priorities beyond the
fights over deficit reduction to try to soften his partyfs position on
immigration. Speaking at a research group downtown, he explicitly embraced
offering illegal immigrants brought to the United States as children a pathway
to legal residency and citizenship, a position he had opposed. And he endorsed
in broad terms a comprehensive overhaul of the nationfs immigration laws.
gIfm pleased these discussions make border security,
employment verification and creating a workable guest worker program an
immediate priority. Itfs the right thing to do for our families, for our
security, and for our economy,h Mr. Cantor said. But he warned, gThere are some
who would rather avoid fixing the problem in order to save this as a political
issue.h
Representative Raúl R. Labrador, Republican of Idaho,
also challenged immigration advocates on the question of a political versus
policy victory.
gIf we want a political solution, you guys are going
to insist on a pathway to citizenship,h he said. gYoufre going to beat
Republicans over the head on this issue. But if we want a policy solution, I
think therefs good will here in the House of Representatives for us to come
together, actually pass a pragmatic solution to the current problem that we
have, and solve and modernize the immigration system for years to come.h
In a flurry of immigration legislation offered in
recent days in the House, a bipartisan group of lawmakers, led by Representative
Jerrold Nadler, Democrat of New York, introduced a bill on Tuesday that would
allow American citizens with foreign-born same-sex spouses or partners to obtain
permanent resident visas, known as green cards, for them. Mr. Nadlerfs proposal
would allow a well-established same-sex couple to apply for a green card,
avoiding any direct challenge to a federal law that bans recognition of gay
marriage.
Julia Preston contributed reporting from New York, and Jonathan Weisman from
Washington.